<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Republic Publishing &#187; quality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.republicpublishing.co.uk/tag/quality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.republicpublishing.co.uk</link>
	<description>Brand Communication through editorial</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Blogging off the cuff</title>
		<link>http://www.republicpublishing.co.uk/2009/05/06/blogging-off-the-cuff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.republicpublishing.co.uk/2009/05/06/blogging-off-the-cuff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 11:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Holland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audioboo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicpublishing.co.uk/?p=7270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a bit of luck you’ll notice we’re all blogging here regularly. Wednesday is my day, and I’m unprepared. Thoroughly unprepared. So exactly what will come out when I empty my brainbox onto the keyboard? Twaddle, probably, but fortunately I’m not alone in my ineptitude. It’s a problem plaguing the web. Blogs, Twitter, comments and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cdn.republicpublishing.co.uk.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/blog.jpg"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-7271" title="Blog keys" src="http://cdn.republicpublishing.co.uk.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/blog-150x150.jpg" alt="Blog keys" width="150" height="150" /></a>With a bit of luck you’ll notice we’re all blogging here regularly. Wednesday is my day, and I’m unprepared. Thoroughly unprepared. So exactly what will come out when I empty my brainbox onto the keyboard? Twaddle, probably, but fortunately I’m not alone in my ineptitude. It’s a problem plaguing the web.</p>
<p>Blogs, <a href="http://www.twitter.com/electricpig" target="_blank">Twitter</a>, comments and message boards teem with diatribe blurted out before it can be given the cognition it deserves. The results range from the incomprehensible to the abusive, but how do you deal with it? And should you?</p>
<p><span id="more-7270"></span><br />
The appeal of blogs, tweets and even new tools like <a href="http://www.audioboo.com" target="_blank">AudioBoo</a> are their immediacy, their intimacy and their spur of the moment honesty. But too often those rough diamonds are lost amongst the swill of gobbledegook from the bloggosphere, twitterati and comment trolls.</p>
<p>With a few exceptions, devining reliable information from the web is a dark art, but one we’re mastering. At Republic Publishing we’re immensely proud of our editorial standards. None of our sites host unbalanced outbursts, un-checked sources or baseless opinion.</p>
<p>As old fashioned as it sounds in the shiny world of the web, they’re editorial traditions, often forgotten by online publishers, but just as valid online as in the print domain.</p>
<p>But that’s just the content we can control. What about reader input, or to use media parlance, “user-generated content.”</p>
<p>Potentially, it’s a minefield. Take the comments section of <a href="http://www.electricpig.co.uk" target="_blank">Electricpig</a>. In the past 12 months just ten percent of comments were legitimate, and in the great scheme of the web, that’s remarkably high.</p>
<p>In the last year, spammers have hurled just shy of 30,000 bogus links, swearwords and gibberish its way. Easily enough to drown out valid and interesting debate. But it’s worth the effort to sift the gold dust from the silt. Engaging our audience is what makes Republic Publishing’s approach work.</p>
<p>We don’t just slap content on the web and hope for the best. We reach out to readers with properly planned, brilliantly executed copy, pictures and video. It’s hardly surprising they want to get involved. If only more of the web thought the same way.</p>
<p>Oh, and in case you were wondering, of course I planned this blog post. Fooled you though, didn&#8217;t I?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.republicpublishing.co.uk/2009/05/06/blogging-off-the-cuff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corporate blogging &#8211; trust can&#8217;t exist without continual quality</title>
		<link>http://www.republicpublishing.co.uk/2009/04/29/corporate-blogging-trust-cant-exist-without-continual-quality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.republicpublishing.co.uk/2009/04/29/corporate-blogging-trust-cant-exist-without-continual-quality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicpublishing.co.uk/?p=7080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s not a subscribers-only fact that trust has to be earned. In the corporate blogosphere establishing and nurturing trust between audience and brand is vital if companies hope to engage consumers and narrow the gap between &#8220;us and them&#8221;. Of course gaining trust is a tough nut to crack in corporate blogging, and can only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-7081" title="Lie detector" src="http://cdn.republicpublishing.co.uk.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/lie-detector-150x150.jpg" alt="Lie detector" width="150" height="150" />It&#8217;s not a subscribers-only fact that trust has to be earned. In the corporate blogosphere establishing and nurturing trust between audience and brand is vital if companies hope to engage consumers and narrow the gap between &#8220;us and them&#8221;. Of course gaining trust is a tough nut to crack in corporate blogging, and can only be achieved via a sustained effort (we don&#8217;t implicitly trust someone we&#8217;ve only ever had a dialogue with a few times), fueled by interesting and credible articles that offer an open side-door into what makes a company tick, and dare I say lay bare a some part of its soul. This can be distilled simply as continual quality.</p>
<p><span id="more-7080"></span>There&#8217;s an interesting piece over on <a href="http://www.econtentmag.com/" target="_blank">EContent</a>, posted by Jessica Howard and Justin Evans from <a href="http://stresslimitdesign.com/" target="_blank">Stresslimitdesign</a>, that supports this notion and explores related ideas in connection to corporate blogging and social media strategies. Here&#8217;s a highlight snippet from the piece:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;What marketers and PR departments are missing is that social media can’t be used as a venue for traditional, unilateral advertising. Social media is about building trust and relationships – and people typically only stay in relationships that are mutually beneficial. Blogs are often the first step corporate brands take into the social media world, so it is important to make a positive first impression&#8230; it is important to make a positive first impression. The key to doing this is to remember that blogs work when offering an authentic and knowledgeable voice, as opposed to canned corporate messaging.</p></blockquote>
<p>Naturally we&#8217;re only scratching the surface here, as there are so many nuances to building trust when it comes to corporate blogging as publishers, and educating some marketeers. But if I can wrap up this post with just one rule (of many) for when engaging in corporate blogging, caring about the subject matter is absolutely crucial &#8211; if, as the author, you don&#8217;t feel and believe it, guaranteed no one else will.</p>
<p>Share your ideas on corporate blogging in the comments section below.</p>
<p><em>Photo of lie detector from <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/rexroof/1279562582/" target="_blank">Rex Roof</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.republicpublishing.co.uk/2009/04/29/corporate-blogging-trust-cant-exist-without-continual-quality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 3/18 queries in 0.039 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: cdn.republicpublishing.co.uk.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.republicpublishing.co.uk @ 2012-02-07 21:26:34 -->
